Skip to main content

Regular Commits

Regular Commits is a software development discipline where practitioners commit code changes to a version control system at a high frequency. This practice focuses on capturing small, incremental, and logically consistent units of work. The primary objective is to create a detailed and traceable history of a project's evolution, which serves to minimize the risk of data loss, improve team collaboration, and streamline the debugging process.

Rationale / Basis​

The rationale for adopting regular commits is rooted in both risk mitigation and process optimization. By creating frequent "safe points," the practice protects against the loss of work due to system failures or critical errors, as developers can revert to a recent stable state with minimal effort. This frequent checkpointing lowers developer anxiety and reduces the cognitive load associated with managing large, uncommitted change sets.

From a collaborative standpoint, regular commits enhance team-wide visibility. A frequently updated commit log acts as a near real-time stream of information, allowing team members to understand project progress and stay aware of changes in related code areas without direct communication. This transparency is critical for enabling parallel work, reducing merge conflicts, and supporting workflows like feature toggles where in-progress work can be shared safely. This practice combats cognitive tunneling, where a developer's focus becomes too narrow, by providing tangible milestones that reinforce a sense of progress.

Implementation / Methodologies​

Implementing a regular commit discipline can be achieved through several established patterns. The choice of pattern often depends on team preference and project context.

  • Task-Based Commits: This is the most common approach, where a commit is made after completing a small, logical unit of work. The unit could be fixing a bug, implementing a single function, or completing a specific sub-task from a larger story. The key is that the commit represents a complete and stable state (e.g., all tests pass).
  • Time-Based Commits: Teams may enforce a time-based cadence, such as committing at least every 60-90 minutes, regardless of task completion. This pattern ensures that no work remains uncommitted for long periods, though it may require subsequent cleanup of the commit history.
  • Signal-Driven Commits: This pattern uses automated signals from the development environment to prompt a commit. For example, a developer might commit every time the full test suite passes after a change, using the green signal as a cue that a stable state has been achieved.

Context / Considerations​

While beneficial, the practice of regular commits must be balanced with other principles to be effective. A primary consideration is the principle of atomic commits, which dictates that each commit should represent a single, complete logical change. Overly frequent or fragmented commits can lead to a noisy and unhelpful commit history.

Furthermore, the effectiveness of this discipline is highly dependent on the team's proficiency with version control tools. Developers must be skilled in using features like interactive rebasing and squashing to clean up and structure their local commit history before sharing it with the team. Without this secondary skill, a high frequency of commits can pollute the main branch history, making it difficult to review and understand. Using local branches, working against them and squash merge all the changes helps to get the best of both worlds.